Select School Year |
|
School Improvement Plan (SIP) |
|
The School Improvement Plan (SIP) is a live document that is subject to change based on School Advisory Council (SAC) recommendations.
|
School Name |
Sawgrass ES (3401) |
School Year |
2018 - 2019 |
School Grade (2017 - 2018) |
A |
Executive Summary |
Download/View Executive Summary
|
BEST PRACTICE #1
A Focused and Authentic PLC
PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES (PLC)
A Professional Learning Community (PLC) is a process in which teachers
work in teams and use student information to develop strategies to improve their classroom practices.
|
PLC Name |
Day(s) of Week |
Week(s) of Month |
Start/End Dates |
Start/End Times |
Grade |
PLC Schedule |
Monday Tuesday Wednesday
|
1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th
|
8/28/2018 - 5/10/2019
|
2:15 PM - 3:00 PM
|
Pre K, K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
|
|
BEST PRACTICE #2
An Embedded High Quality RtI Process
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION (RTI)
Response to Intervention (RtI) uses student academic and behavior information to identify students with learning
and behavior needs to guarantee that those in danger of failure and/or retention are receiving assistance and support.
|
Graduation/College and Career Readiness (Early Warning Indicators)
Data For: 2017-2018 (Last updated: 9/18/2019) |
Grade |
Student Enrollment |
% of students with attendance below 90% |
% of students with 1 or more suspensions |
% of students with course failure in ELA or Math |
% of students level 1 in ELA or Math |
% of students exhibiting 2 or more Early Warning Indicators |
KG |
165 |
27.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
N/A
|
0.00
|
01 |
221 |
20.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
1.00
|
02 |
194 |
12.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
1.00
|
03 |
197 |
22.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
43.00
|
1.00
|
04 |
169 |
16.00
|
1.00
|
0.00
|
33.00
|
1.00
|
05 |
177 |
22.00
|
1.00
|
0.00
|
39.00
|
2.00
|
|
Describe all intervention strategies employed by the school to improve the academic performance of students identified by the early warning system.
Sawgrass Elem will address the early warning indicator identified for the 2017-2018 school year on the percent of students in Level 1 in ELA or Math. We are implementing the
following intervention strategies to improve academic performance with the use of Quarterly Data Chats, Small group push-in and pull out support, the RtI process, and iReady and online reading and math program.
Reading and Math interventions/strategies vary from grade-level to grade-level, based on analysis of diagnostic tests, and/or pre-identified as indicators of students in need,
such as the District-level criteria outlined in Policy 6000.1, classroom observations, and other classroom assessments. Students with high-risk indicators are monitored through
the RtI process in order to address both academic and social-emotional needs.
Strategies:
Differentiated instruction; additional ½ hour of reading intervention instruction outside of literacy instruction block; peer tutoring; pull-out small groups with literacy coaches; afterschool
book club; academic camps in both reading and math; high school Book Buddies; Latinos in Action Mentor Group; Summer Reading Incentive Program; Home access to
reading and math technology
Reading:
Grade 1, Grade 2: LLI
Grade 3 - Phonics for Reading, Quick Reads, Journeys Write-In Readers
Grade 4-5 – LLI, Journeys Write In Readers, Quick Reads, Just Words, N ewsela
Math:
Kindergarten- hands-on activities based on student needs; Math Journals, Reflex math
Grade 1-5 – Go Math Reteach, Go Math Intensive, Go Math Strategic Lessons; Math Journals,Reflex Math
|
RtI Team Meeting Schedule
Day(s) of Week |
Week(s) of Month |
Start/End Dates |
Start/End Times |
Thursday
|
1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th
|
9/6/2018 - 3/29/2019
|
8:00 AM - 3:00 PM
|
|
BEST PRACTICE #3
Optimal Internal/External Relationships
ACCREDITATION PROCESS
The Accreditation Process leads schools to critically evaluate teaching and
learning with a focus on academic excellence. All stakeholders (parents, students, staff, and community) are part of the accreditation process.
|
Self-Assessment Ratings
|
Accreditation Standard |
Overall Rating |
Purpose and Direction |
|
Governance and Leadership |
|
Teaching and Assessing for Learning |
|
Resources and Support Systems |
|
Using Results for Continuous Improvement |
|
Explain the activities in which your school will participate to increase your overall rating. Include specific details.
|
|
No Evidence/Artifacts
|
|
SCHOOL ADVISORY COUNCIL (SAC)
Each school has a School (SAC) to facilitate the development and monitor progress of the annual School Improvement Plan.
Agendas and minutes reflect annual needs assessment, SIP monitoring and allocation of Accountability Funds.
|
SAC Upload Center
|
BEST PRACTICE #4
Scaling Up BEST Practices
CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT
School improvement is based on a continuous improvement model, using research-based accepted best practices, which align with student
achievement needs, insure student progress, and may be revised when appropriate.
|
|
Goals
As evidenced in the SES Band Data, which content area(s) will be the focus for improving student achievement and why was this area chosen?
For the 2018-2019 school year, our focus is to continue to improving student achievement is in the area of Math as well as growing in the amount of students that score proficent in math. Our focus within math is not just improving the amount of students in grades 3-5 that score proficient on the FSA, but as well as improving and shrinking our lowest 25% percentile. When looking specifically at the reading data, the trend shows that across the board our weakest area comes within comprehension for reading and fluency for math. As a leadership team, it was decided that this would be our school wide focus since when looking at the data math has made the smallest amount of gains. We believed as a leadership team that having the school wide focus be math, it would allow for a variety of learning both at thestudent level and the professional level as well.
|
What specific BEST Practice(s) will be implemented or scaled-up to improve teaching and learning in order to increase performance within the SES Band?
During the 2018-2019 school year, we will have a variety of different best practices being implemented to improve teaching and learning to increase our reading data in the SES
Band. Throughout the entire school we have implemented a fact fluency challenge. This allows us to go back to the basics for building the foundation for math concepts to be laid.
Not only are we focused on improving our fact fluency across the board, we are also working on utlizling small group instruction for math to be able to remediate and reteach those standards that are not being mastered. Besides a variety of computer based programs to help increase performance, we are focusing our PLCs in math as well. Having teachers conduct their PLC in math allows the teachers to see specifically where as a grade level they had their defecate and then grade levels are able to collaborate together to find ways to successfully implement those math standards and strategies in the classroom for all levels.
|
Describe in detail how the BEST Practice(s) will be scaled-up.
Throughout the school year, there will be a variety of ways in how our BEST practices will be scaled up. First off, teachers will be expected to submit quarterly progress
monitoring tests to their lowest 25% in math. Additionally each month we conduct a item analysis on the standards that are being assessed and are able to create a focus within the classroom on how to remediate those standards either as a whole group or in small group. Teachers will additionally have quaterly data chats with their lowest 25% and continue to track their students progress on both chapter assessments, progress monitoring assessment and within our fact fluency challenges.
PLC groups will be implemented focusing on a variety of math standards. Within the PLCs teachers will be highly encouraged to conduct coaching cycles to support the content
and data discussed at the PLCs. An administrator or Coach will attend each PLC in grades 3-5, to monitor that teachers collaborate and share their best practices.
|
What specific school-level progress monitoring data is collected and how often?
Currently for the 2018-2019 school year we have a variety of ways we collect and monitor student data. Every month for both reading and math, students take a progress monitoring assessment wherer then the teachers are required to upload student scores to the one drive where the leadership team and other grade level members are able to share and talk about best practices for what worked and what did not work. Additionally, teachers meet with the leadership team monthly to discuss student data and any trends they are starting to notice.
|
How does the school ensure the fidelity of students not progressing towards school and district goals?
To ensure the fidelity of students not progressing towards the school and district goals we provide a wide range of resources. This school year we were able to add on a Math Resource teacher who is able to both pull out and push in support to classrooms with students not progressing towards the school and district goals. On top of push in/pull out support and RtI we additionally open our ELO enrichment camp for those struggling students in either the lowest 30% or those who are ELL students.
|
How does the school ensure that all classroom instruction is accessible to the full range of learners using Universal Designs for Learning (UDL) for effective instructional design (planning) and delivery (teaching)?
Teachers use the UDL Process to plan instruction in tier PLC's. Teacher have been availed the Test Specifications for each standard and use this infraction to determine rigor and the necessary scaffolding steps needed to assist our most struggling learners make progress. Teacher are also provided ongoing support throughout the school in several areas by both the Literacy Coach and outside trainers brought in to provide robust professional development.
|
How does the school ensure Tier 1 Standards-Based classroom instruction is being implemented properly and effectively?
Every month for both reading and math, students take a progress monitoring assessment where the teachers are required to upload student scores to the one drive. This data is used to drive conversations about data and specific misconceptions when teaching selected standards. The overall goal is regularly reflect on data and teaching in order to effect Tier 1 instruction.
|
Describe texts used for core, supplemental, and intervention programs at each grade level. How does the school ensure students have access to a balance of literary and informational text in a variety of mediums?
The school makes available all core programs in each content area. Additionally, each teacher has received training on how to access and use resources found in the new Canvas course created by the Elementary Learning Department which has enabled staff to access even more resources with the additional support they may need already built in to the Canvas Course
The school and district have invested in a guided reading book room and other supplemental resources such as Scholastic Story Works, i-Ready LAFS books and interactive read aloud texts. While all of these resources are critical in implementing a sound balanced literacy program the training and support ours teacher receive in the areas of balanced literacy are even more important to the implementation of a balanced literacy culture in each classroom.
|
|
Strategies & Activities
Strategies |
Persons responsible |
Deadline |
Professional Development |
Budget |
Small group math training |
Ms. delSol |
10/26/2018
|
Elementary Math Dept. / Small Group Training |
Title 1 Substitutes
|
ELO camp, small guided reading groups, RtI |
Moriama Del Sol; Assistant Principal & Michelle Amento; Reading Coach |
5/9/2019
|
|
Title 1 Funds
|
|
BPIE Files