Select School Year |
|
School Improvement Plan (SIP) |
|
The School Improvement Plan (SIP) is a live document that is subject to change based on School Advisory Council (SAC) recommendations.
|
School Name |
Lauderdale Lakes MS (1701) |
School Year |
2018 - 2019 |
School Grade (2017 - 2018) |
C |
Executive Summary |
Download/View Executive Summary
|
BEST PRACTICE #1
A Focused and Authentic PLC
PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES (PLC)
A Professional Learning Community (PLC) is a process in which teachers
work in teams and use student information to develop strategies to improve their classroom practices.
|
PLC Name |
Day(s) of Week |
Week(s) of Month |
Start/End Dates |
Start/End Times |
Grade |
Innovative Programs |
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday
|
1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th
|
9/7/2018 - 5/17/2018
|
7:10 AM - 8:00 AM
|
6, 7, 8
|
Math |
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday
|
1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th
|
9/14/2018 - 5/17/2018
|
8:03 AM - 8:53 AM
|
6, 7, 8
|
Science |
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday
|
1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th
|
9/7/2018 - 5/17/2018
|
9:49 AM - 10:39 AM
|
6, 7, 8
|
Social Studies |
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday
|
1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th
|
9/7/2018 - 5/17/2018
|
12:05 PM - 12:55 PM
|
6, 7, 8
|
ELA |
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday
|
1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th
|
9/7/2018 - 5/17/2018
|
12:55 PM - 1:45 PM
|
6, 7, 8
|
Reading |
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday
|
1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th
|
9/7/2018 - 5/17/2018
|
1:50 PM - 2:40 PM
|
6, 7, 8
|
|
BEST PRACTICE #2
An Embedded High Quality RtI Process
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION (RTI)
Response to Intervention (RtI) uses student academic and behavior information to identify students with learning
and behavior needs to guarantee that those in danger of failure and/or retention are receiving assistance and support.
|
Graduation/College and Career Readiness (Early Warning Indicators)
Data For: 2017-2018 (Last updated: 9/18/2019) |
Grade |
Student Enrollment |
% of students with attendance below 90% |
% of students with 1 or more suspensions |
% of students with course failure in ELA or Math |
% of students level 1 in ELA or Math |
% of students exhibiting 2 or more Early Warning Indicators |
06 |
323 |
37.00
|
107.00
|
22.00
|
166.00
|
28.00
|
07 |
297 |
54.00
|
84.00
|
20.00
|
171.00
|
35.00
|
08 |
301 |
63.00
|
94.00
|
3.00
|
160.00
|
64.00
|
|
Describe all intervention strategies employed by the school to improve the academic performance of students identified by the early warning system.
1. At risk academic students are identified through D/F reports weekly.
2. At risk behavior students are identified through BASIS data reports weekly.
3. Each D/F student and each behavior student's name is presented weekly through our SAED meetings.
4. At risk students are assigned a guidance team member, instructional coach or assistant principal (A life Coach) and monitoring frequency is determined based on need.
5. Outcomes of interventions are shared weekly and a determination is made wether or not to continue monitoring lessen the Tiered support provided to the student.
|
RtI Team Meeting Schedule
Day(s) of Week |
Week(s) of Month |
Start/End Dates |
Start/End Times |
Tuesday
|
1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th
|
9/3/2018 - 5/17/2018
|
9:00 AM - 11:00 AM
|
|
BEST PRACTICE #3
Optimal Internal/External Relationships
ACCREDITATION PROCESS
The Accreditation Process leads schools to critically evaluate teaching and
learning with a focus on academic excellence. All stakeholders (parents, students, staff, and community) are part of the accreditation process.
|
Self-Assessment Ratings
|
Accreditation Standard |
Overall Rating |
Purpose and Direction |
|
Governance and Leadership |
|
Teaching and Assessing for Learning |
|
Resources and Support Systems |
|
Using Results for Continuous Improvement |
|
Explain the activities in which your school will participate to increase your overall rating. Include specific details.
|
|
No Evidence/Artifacts
|
|
SCHOOL ADVISORY COUNCIL (SAC)
Each school has a School (SAC) to facilitate the development and monitor progress of the annual School Improvement Plan.
Agendas and minutes reflect annual needs assessment, SIP monitoring and allocation of Accountability Funds.
|
SAC Upload Center
|
BEST PRACTICE #4
Scaling Up BEST Practices
CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT
School improvement is based on a continuous improvement model, using research-based accepted best practices, which align with student
achievement needs, insure student progress, and may be revised when appropriate.
|
|
Goals
As evidenced in the SES Band Data, which content area(s) will be the focus for improving student achievement and why was this area chosen?
Based on SES Band Data, the content areas that we will be focusing on for improving student achievement is lowest 25% learning gains for both reading and math.
We chose these area because students in the lowest 25% are not making gains at the same rate as student's not in the lowest 25%. Additionally, our goal is for the lowest 25% students to have 60% gains. This will contribute towards our efforts of becoming a "B" school (53 percentage points, where we currently have 48 percentage points, therefore needing +5 percentage points).
|
What specific BEST Practice(s) will be implemented or scaled-up to improve teaching and learning in order to increase performance within the SES Band?
Our specific BESTpractice #1 that will be scaled up is Authentic Professional Learning Communities (PLCs).
|
Describe in detail how the BEST Practice(s) will be scaled-up.
During PLC's we look at student evidence and data to make decisions about curriculum. We also support teacher's development by providing feedback on lesson plans and activity alignment to standards. Teacher's share best practices about small group instruction and research based instructional practices.
|
What specific school-level progress monitoring data is collected and how often?
Through our SEAD collaboration, we identify target groups and progress monitor their learning. Instructional coaches collaborate to support teacher's in implementing Formative assessments which we will review to identify if we are on track to meeting our goals. Adminstrators meet with teacher's through building capacity to have data chats with teachers. Additionally, teachers and instructional leaders review diagnostic data for both i-Ready and Achieve 3000 to create small groups for classrooms and provide targeted remediation.
|
How does the school ensure the fidelity of students not progressing towards school and district goals?
Item Specs are utilized to provide feedback to teachers and create formative assessments. Conversations around assessment limits are had to ensure fidelity of assessments. Lowest 25% classes have a "para scorecard" in which we track at risk students and determine if they are meeting their remediation goals on i-Ready and Achieve 3000. Additionally, all students are met with twice a quarter by their Life Coach Ambassador to determine if students are on track to making learning gains in both Math and Reading utilizing i-Ready and Achieve 3000 pathways.
|
How does the school ensure that all classroom instruction is accessible to the full range of learners using Universal Designs for Learning (UDL) for effective instructional design (planning) and delivery (teaching)?
Teacher's are supported with standards based planning during Power Hour by instructional coaches. Teacher's unwrap standards and identify standards-based activities. During PLCs teacher's collaborate on best practices and resources for small group instruction (delivery). During Power Hour teacher's also collaborate on cross-curricular planning which supports diverse learners. Technology is also utilized on a daily basis for small group instruction (blended learning).
|
How does the school ensure Tier 1 Standards-Based classroom instruction is being implemented properly and effectively?
The FAST Pass feedback cycle is utilzied with the Lowest 25% teachers in both ELA and Math to support teacher's by providing timely feedback. Teacher's utilze Power Hour which is progress monitored through instructional coach support to ensure the fidelity of Tier 1 practices. Administrators conduct informal observations to provide teachers with feedback on Tier 1 instructional practices, as well as meet with teacher's through building capacity sessions to provide feedback and identify next steps.
|
Describe texts used for core, supplemental, and intervention programs at each grade level. How does the school ensure students have access to a balance of literary and informational text in a variety of mediums?
The core text utilzied is Collections in the ELA classrooms. For interventions we utlize the Inside textbook. For supplemental material for Lowest 25% classes we utilze Achieve 3000. LAFS is used as a supplement for push-in support by the instructional coach/AP small group instruction.
|
Please complete this section based on 2018-2019 end-of-year results. Instructional Implications: Discuss the success of specific strategies/activities and provide a rationale as to why those academic improvements occurred as a result of those strategies.
Our focus was on for improving student achievement in the lowest 25% , for both ELA and Math; the goal was for 40% and 50% respectively, which resulted in 35% and 45%.
|
|
Strategies & Activities
Strategies |
Persons responsible |
Deadline |
Professional Development |
Budget |
Remediation for Reading and Math |
Jill Slesinski |
4/1/2019
|
Math 180 and Reading 180 Professional Development |
$8,000.00
|
Created PLC ambassador groups to build capacity. Agendas are collaborated on ahead of time. Teachers have input as to what PLC goals should be/outcomes. Instructional coaches/AP will provide feedback to Ambassadors on PLC district protocols. |
Willie, Clerveaux, Riley, Joseph, PLC Ambassadors, AP's |
10/11/2018
|
N/A |
|
|
BPIE Files
File Name |
Uploaded Date |
BPIE.pdf
|
9/14/2018 |
|