MTSS-RtI Plan |
|
School Name |
Tequesta Trace MS (3151) |
School Year |
2017 - 2018 |
Data-Based Problem-Solving
Current Average | |||||||||
0 | |||||||||
Goal Average
For 2017 - 2018 |
|||||||||
0 | |||||||||
What elements will be addressed? | |||||||||
DBPS for student outcomes occurs across content areas, grade levels, and tiers Across tiers, data used to identify "gap" between expected and current outcomes Data are used to identify reasons why students are not meeting expectations Plans based on verified reasons why students are not meeting expectations Student progress specific to academic or behavior goals are monitored Data are used to address performance across diverse group Resources for implementation of MTSS are addressed through data-based problem-solving |
|||||||||
Why is it occuring? | |||||||||
What are we going to do about it? | |||||||||
Action Plan | |||||||||
How will we monitor and measure our success? | |||||||||
Person(s) Responsible | |||||||||
Follow Up Date | |||||||||
Completion Date | |||||||||
Supporting Evidence for Data-Based Problem-Solving
|
Three Tiered Instructional /Intervention Model
Current Average |
0 |
Goal Average
For 2017 - 2018 |
2 |
What elements will be addressed? |
Tier 1 academic practices clearly identify learning standards Tier 1 behavior practices identify school-wide expectations Tier 2 academic practices include common student needs, are linked to Tier 1 Tier 2 behavior practices include common student needs, are linked to Tier 1 Tier 3 academic practices are based on students' needs, aligned with Tier 1 and Tier 2 Tier 3 behavior practices are based on students' needs, aligned with Tier 1 and Tier 2 |
Why is it occuring? |
Lack of coaching/case leader to assist teacher in implementation to intervents. |
What are we going to do about it? |
Work with math department to facilitate a math pullout to address math skills to students lacking the minimum skills. |
Action Plan |
Meet with math department |
How will we monitor and measure our success? |
Monitor and measure success by reviewing targeted students' proficiency over a period of time on math assessments. |
Person(s) Responsible |
Selima Watson and CPSTeam |
Follow Up Date |
2018-01-14 |
Completion Date |
2018-05-30 |
Data-Evaluation
Current Average |
0 |
Goal Average
For 2017 - 2018 |
2 |
What elements will be addressed? |
Staff understand and have access to data sources Policies and procedures for decision-making are established Effective data tools are used appropriately and independently by staff Data sources are used to evaluate the fidelity and impact Available resources are allocated effectively Data sources are monitored for consistency and accuracy |
Why is it occuring? |
Teachers are not adequately trained to provide student data on specific interventions. Data collection templates are not utilized correctly. Data indicates lack of proficency in math skills, however due to enrollment and SES band group, we did not have additional resources to support math intervention. |
What are we going to do about it? |
Utilize district math instructional facilitators to provide remediation in math skills based on student needs per data collected. |
Action Plan |
The Math departments' focus this year will be to remediate, and improve the scores of the lowest 25% of students and to address the data evaulation and address tier interventions. We plan on using a combination of the following: 1. iReady teacher toolbox and resources to practice fluency skills in content material. 2. District provided Mini-MAFS and performance tasks to practice standards and questions resembling the FSA. 3. Spiral reviews to practice the weakest skills sets on a regular basis. 4. Online textbook components such as online tutor and online practice quizzes to work on standards that may be challenging to students. 5. We will use USA test prep to follow up on our diagnostic test results and assign practice on the lowest assessed standards. We are scaling up our use of District provided resources and performance tasks to evaluate student performance and to help guide discussion of teacher best practices during our PLC meetings. |
How will we monitor and measure our success? |
Monitor and measure our success through the number of math interventions implemented with fidelity. |
Person(s) Responsible |
Selima Watson, AP and CPST Team |
Follow Up Date |
2018-01-14 |
Completion Date |
2018-05-30 |