MTSS-RtI Plan |
|
School Name |
Griffin ES (2851) |
School Year |
2017 - 2018 |
Leadership
Current Average | ||||||||||||
0 | ||||||||||||
Goal Average
For 2017 - 2018 |
||||||||||||
80 | ||||||||||||
What elements will be addressed? | ||||||||||||
The principal is actively involved A leadership team is established The leadership team actively engages in ongoing professional development A strategic plan for MTSS implementation is developed The leadership team is actively facilitating implementation |
||||||||||||
Why is it occuring? | ||||||||||||
The leadership team must meet to determine the needs of the students in order to prioritize MTSS/RtI. |
||||||||||||
What are we going to do about it? | ||||||||||||
We are going to meet as a team in order to discuss student achievement and time frame for implementation. |
||||||||||||
Action Plan | ||||||||||||
We will utilize individual data chats to discuss the specific needs of each student in order to identify the lowest 25%ile of students for the RTI/MTSS referral database. |
||||||||||||
How will we monitor and measure our success? | ||||||||||||
We will monitor this through quarterly data chats and MTSS meetings to analyze student growth and progress towards the goal. This will inform the tiered instruction. |
||||||||||||
Person(s) Responsible | ||||||||||||
CPS TEAM (Teena Novack, Alison Rasgado, Carolina Zambrano, Gail Silig, Thomas Nordstrom) |
||||||||||||
Follow Up Date | ||||||||||||
2018-01-15 |
||||||||||||
Completion Date | ||||||||||||
2018-05-15 |
||||||||||||
Supporting Evidence for Leadership
|
Communication and Collaboration
Current Average | ||||||||||||
0 | ||||||||||||
Goal Average
For 2017 - 2018 |
||||||||||||
80 | ||||||||||||
What elements will be addressed? | ||||||||||||
Staff have consensus and engage in MTSS Implementation Staff are provided data on MTSS fidelity and student outcomes The infrastructure exists to support family and community engagement Educators actively engage families in MTSS |
||||||||||||
Why is it occuring? | ||||||||||||
Because parents are an integral part of the MTSS/RtI team. |
||||||||||||
What are we going to do about it? | ||||||||||||
We are inviting parents to attend Bi-Weekly MTSS/RtI meetings with the appropriate staff in order to adress student learning needs. |
||||||||||||
Action Plan | ||||||||||||
We are creating a timeline to plan for MTSS/RtI Meetings up through March in order to ensure that parents have adequate time to plan to attend meetings or reschedule if needed. Parents will be encouraged to attend MTSS/RtI meetings in person or by phone. Student data will be shared with parents to ensure parents understand the tiered instruction. |
||||||||||||
How will we monitor and measure our success? | ||||||||||||
We will monitor by collecting data on parent attendance at MTSS/RtI meetings. |
||||||||||||
Person(s) Responsible | ||||||||||||
CPS TEAM (Teena Novack, Alison Rasgado, Carolina Zambrano, Gail Silig, Thomas Nordstrom) |
||||||||||||
Follow Up Date | ||||||||||||
2018-01-15 |
||||||||||||
Completion Date | ||||||||||||
2018-05-15 |
||||||||||||
Supporting Evidence for Communication and Collaboration
|
Three Tiered Instructional /Intervention Model
Current Average | ||||||
0 | ||||||
Goal Average
For 2017 - 2018 |
||||||
0 | ||||||
What elements will be addressed? | ||||||
Tier 1 academic practices clearly identify learning standards Tier 1 behavior practices identify school-wide expectations Tier 2 academic practices include common student needs, are linked to Tier 1 Tier 2 behavior practices include common student needs, are linked to Tier 1 Tier 3 academic practices are based on students' needs, aligned with Tier 1 and Tier 2 Tier 3 behavior practices are based on students' needs, aligned with Tier 1 and Tier 2 |
||||||
Why is it occuring? | ||||||
What are we going to do about it? | ||||||
Action Plan | ||||||
How will we monitor and measure our success? | ||||||
Person(s) Responsible | ||||||
Follow Up Date | ||||||
Completion Date | ||||||
Supporting Evidence for Three Tiered Instructional /Intervention Model
|
Data-Evaluation
Current Average | ||||||||||||||||||
0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Goal Average
For 2017 - 2018 |
||||||||||||||||||
80 | ||||||||||||||||||
What elements will be addressed? | ||||||||||||||||||
Staff understand and have access to data sources Policies and procedures for decision-making are established Effective data tools are used appropriately and independently by staff Data sources are used to evaluate the fidelity and impact Available resources are allocated effectively Data sources are monitored for consistency and accuracy |
||||||||||||||||||
Why is it occuring? | ||||||||||||||||||
Because appropriate data analysis is needed to identify and track the area of concern. |
||||||||||||||||||
What are we going to do about it? | ||||||||||||||||||
We are going to provide professional development including hands on training. |
||||||||||||||||||
Action Plan | ||||||||||||||||||
We will implement a BASIS training to gather previous and current data as well as utilizing the data to drive intervention instruction. A 2nd BASIS training will be hands on to utilize BASIS for the RTI/MTSS referral database. |
||||||||||||||||||
How will we monitor and measure our success? | ||||||||||||||||||
We will monitor through our CPST/MTSS meetings. CPST members will be identified as a contact person for each grade level. |
||||||||||||||||||
Person(s) Responsible | ||||||||||||||||||
CPS TEAM (Teena Novack, Alison Rasgado, Carolina Zambrano, Gail Silig, Thomas Nordstrom) |
||||||||||||||||||
Follow Up Date | ||||||||||||||||||
2018-01-15 |
||||||||||||||||||
Completion Date | ||||||||||||||||||
2018-05-15 |
||||||||||||||||||
Supporting Evidence for Data-Evaluation
|